decision sent to author nature communications

Are there differences related to gender or institution within the same review model? Our main question concerns a possible gender bias; therefore, we investigated the relation between OTR rates, review model, and gender, still including both direct submissions and transfers (Table8). . We analysed the dataset of 128,454 records with a non-empty review type to answer the following questions: What are the demographics of authors that choose double-blind peer review? Post Decision Manuscripts Decision summarynature. Especially the status 'Under review' encompasses many steps; while it may appear your manuscript is not progressing through the editorial process, a lot of activities may be happening during this part of the review process. My father emptied the thing at an unknown date ruining my spontaneous project, but at least I was able to recover the skull, jaw, spine & ribs. Helmer M, Schottdorf M, Neef A, Battaglia D. Research: gender bias in scholarly peer review. That is, authors that feel more vulnerable to implicit bias against the prestige of their institutional affiliation or their country tend to choose DBPR to prevent such bias playing a role in the editorial decision. %PDF-1.3 % Our aim was to understand the demographics of author uptake and infer the presence of any potential implicit bias towards gender, country, or institutional prestige in relation to the corresponding author. The decision involved a ruling on a motion to . McGillivray, B., De Ranieri, E. Uptake and outcome of manuscripts in Nature journals by review model and author characteristics. Journal metrics are based on the published output, thus those that are calculated from the output in multiple years will use a partial dataset for recently launched journals. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings. Figure1 shows a Cohen-Friendly association plot indicating deviations from independence of rows (countries) and columns (peer review model) in Table5. Our commitment to early sharing and transparency in peer review inspires us to think about how to help our authors in new ways. As a matter of fact, the models accuracy (as tested on a random sample of 20% of the data chosen as test set) is 0.88, and the model always predicts author choices for SB, which is the majority class. We employed hypothesis testing techniques to test various hypotheses against the data. Decision Summary. Background Double-blind peer review has been proposed as a possible solution to avoid implicit referee bias in academic publishing. manuscripts originally submitted to a journal and subsequently transferred to another journal which was deemed a better fit by the editor. The results of a Pearsons chi-square test of independence are as follows: 2=378.17, degrees of freedom=2, p value <0.001; Cramers V=0.054 and show that authors submitting to more prestigious journals tend to have a slight preference for DBPR compared to SBPR. In the following analysis, we will refer to the data where the gender field is not NA as the Gender Dataset. Authors must sign into CTS with the email address to which the link was sent. How do I check the status of my manuscript? 0000065294 00000 n For further information, please contact Research Square at info@researchsquare.com. Uptake and outcome of manuscripts in Nature journals by review model and author characteristics, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-018-0049-z, https://www.nature.com/nature/for-authors/initial-submission, https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001820, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01102.x, https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/. nature~. Hathaway High School Staff, For Coupons, Giveaways, and Free Games to play with your family, distance between underground pull boxes fiber optic cable, richest instagram influencers non celebrity, big spring correctional center inmate search, rachael newsham and dan cohen relationship, giorno giovanna you will never reach the truth japanese, 34 eye opening photos of the great depression, Real Cuban Link Chain For Sale Near Mumbai, Maharashtra. If you have submitted your manuscript to an Editorial Manager journal but you have not yet received a final decision, you can check its status online. As needed, the journal editors may also ask the committee to provide opinions on the policies and procedures of the journals. Nature Communications was another publishing master stroke for Nature that also took advantage of a new market opportunity. 2.2 The model of bounded rationality. May 2022 lewmar 185tt bow thruster parts . We had gender information for 50,533 corresponding authors and found no statistically significant difference in the distribution of peer review model between males and females (p value=0.6179). 2023 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Once your articleis accepted for publication, you can track its status with the track your accepted article tool. This choice of categories is arbitrary, e.g. . Real Cuban Link Chain For Sale Near Mumbai, Maharashtra, The page is updated on an annual basis. The aims of this study are to analyse the demographics of corresponding authors choosing double-blind peer review and to identify differences in the editorial outcome of manuscripts depending on their review model. Moreover, the two models do not have to be exclusive;one could think of a DBPR stage followed by full public disclosure of reviewers and editors identities and reports. Both authors designed the study and contributed equally to the Results section. Authors might choose SBPR when submitting their best work as they are proud of it and may opt for DBPR for work of lower quality, or, the opposite could be true, that is, authors might prefer to submit their best work as DBPR to give it a fairer chance against implicit bias. When the decision is finalized, you will receive a direct email with the overall editorial decision, Editor and/or reviewer comments, and further instructions. The original authors are given 10 days to respond. The data that support the findings of this study are available from Springer Nature but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. In your 'Author Main Menu' manuscripts appear in different folders as they pass through phases in the editorial process: The submission is waiting for you to complete the submission (or revision) process. Editors need to identify, invite and get (often two or more) reviewers to agree to review. When you submit your article through the manuscript submission systemyou will get the chance to opt in toIn Review. Answer: From the description of the status change of the submission, it seems the manuscript did not pass the formatting check by the editorial staff and required corrections from the author. Table1 displays the number and proportion of transfers by journal group. by | May 28, 2022 | vga white light on asus motherboard | anskan om utbyte av utlndskt krkort | May 28, 2022 | vga white light on asus motherboard | anskan om utbyte av utlndskt krkort Our commitment to early sharing and transparency in peer review inspires us to think about how to help our authors in new ways. IP-address: 40.77.167.199. You should have received an email detailing the changes needed to your submission. However, we did not achieve a good fit, as per the binned plot of residuals against expected values, and the C-index (used to assess the discriminatory ability of standard logistic models) is 0.68, so well below the threshold of 0.8 for good fit. We employed a Wald test to evaluate the statistical significance of each coefficient in the model by testing the hypothesis that the coefficient of an independent variable in the model is significantly different from zero. bounded rationality . Modified on: Thu, 30 Jul, 2020 at 4:54 PM. You have completed the submission and approval steps, and the article has been submitted to the journal. We decided to exclude the NA entries for gender and tested the null hypothesis that the two populations (manuscripts by male corresponding authors and manuscripts by female corresponding authors) have the same OTR rate within each of the two review models. 2017-07-13 11:21. We investigated any potential differences in uptake depending on the journal tier. sean penn parkinson's disease 2021. korttidsminne test siffror; lng eller kort pipa hagel. This process left 13,542 manuscripts without a normalised name; for the rest of the manuscripts, normalised institution names and countries were found, which resulted in 5029 unique institution names. 'Submission Transfers Waiting for Author's Approval'. This is because authors cannot modify their choice of review model at the transfer stage, and thus transfers cannot contribute to the uptake analysis. Nature and Nature Communications are to follow in due course. We observed that DBPR is chosen more often by authors submitting to higher impact journals within the Nature portfolio, by authors from specific countries (India and China in particular, among countries with the highest submission rates), and by authors from less prestigious institutions. 50decision sent to authorwaiting for revisionFigure 2 Article proofs sent to author 4. Journal Issue available online . Help us improve this article with your feedback. An analysis of the journal Behavioral Ecology, which switched to DBPR in 2001, found a significant interaction between gender and time, reflecting the higher number of female authors after 2001, but no significant interaction between gender and review type [11]. 0000001568 00000 n R-CAPTCHA. Similar to the uptake case, the models do not have a good fit to the data. The underlying research question that drove this study is to assess whether DBPR is effective in removing or reducing implicit reviewer bias in peer review. Our commitment to early sharing andtransparency in peer review inspires us to think about how to help our authors in new ways. In order to test whether two variables were independent, we used Pearsons chi-square test of independence and referred to the classification in [21] to define the strength of association. Table7 shows the results; for the sake of completeness, Table7 includes the number and percentages of rejected vs. out-to-review manuscripts for which the gender of the corresponding author was NA. This study provides insight on authors behaviour when submitting to high-impact journals. When analysing data for the entire portfolio, we only included direct submissions (106,373) and we excluded manuscripts that were rejected by one journal and then transferred to another. We calculated that, at this rate, it would take us several decades to collect sufficient data that would result in statistically significant results, so another strategy is required, e.g. 0000001589 00000 n On the other hand, an analysis of the Evolution of Language (EvoLang 11) conference papers found that female authors received higher rankings under DBPR [13]. 0000039536 00000 n We first analysed the demographics of corresponding authors that choose DBPR by journal group, gender, country, and institution group. For this analysis, we used a subset of the 106,373 manuscripts consisting of 58,920 records with non-empty normalised institutions for which a THE rank was available (the Institution Dataset, excluding transfers) (Table4). Is double-blinded peer review necessary? More information regarding the approach taken to derive the median citation can be found here. If you have no email from the journal and have already checked the spam folder of your mailbox, you may check if the submission . The science editor has sole responsibility for the decision to accept or reject a manuscript, and that decision is final. The effects of double-blind versus single-blind reviewing: experimental evidence from The American Economic Review. Posted by May 21, 2022 upphittade katter vstervik on jag har avslutat min anstllning autosvar engelska May 21, 2022 upphittade katter vstervik on jag har avslutat min anstllning autosvar engelska Abstract: The abstract not exceeding 150 words and preferably in . 0000004388 00000 n Editorial Manager displays status terms as described in the table below. ISSN 2041-1723 (online). We then studied the manuscripts editorial outcome in relation to review model and authors characteristics. Submission to first editorial decision: the median time (in days) from when a submission is received to when a first editorial decision about whether the paper was sent out for formal review or not is sent to the authors. Therefore, in the DBPR case, we can conclude that there is a significant difference between the OTR rate of papers by male corresponding authors and the OTR rate of papers by female corresponding authors. A useful set of articles providing general advice about writing and submitting scientific papers can Manuscript # . No, Modified on: Mon, 26 Jul, 2021 at 6:04 PM. To obtain statement and The target number of required reviews has been completed, and the Handling Editor is considering the reviews. And here is a list of journals currently onIn Review. Sodexo Disney Springs, Because of the small size of the data set for accepted papers and of the lack of an independent measure for the quality of the manuscripts, we could not draw firm conclusions on the existence of implicit bias and on the effectiveness of DBPR in reducing or removing it. This is because online submission has completely abolished the uncertainty of postal speed, an obstacle faced when manually submitting a manuscript. Press J to jump to the feed. Our results show that we cannot say that there is a significant difference between authors from prestigious institutions and authors from less prestigious institutions for DBPR-accepted manuscripts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. The editorial and peer review processwill continue through the peer review systemsas usual. Regarding gender bias, a study showed that blinding interviewees in orchestra interviews led to more females being hired [8]. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript. 0000047727 00000 n The journal's Editorial team will check the submission and either send back to the author for action, or assign to an Editor. Any pending input will be lost. The proportion of authors that choose double-blind review is higher when they submit to more prestigious journals, they are affiliated with less prestigious institutions, or they are from specific countries; the double-blind option is also linked to less successful editorial outcomes. We however included transfers in all other analyses because we considered the analysed items as combinations of three attributes: paper, corresponding author, and journal to which the paper was submitted. 9 days How many days did the entire process take? A list of links to the Manuscript Tracking System login pages for each journal is available on the Nature Portfolio Journals A-Z webpage. Authors of accepted papers will receive proofs of their article about 15 business days after the decision is sent. The study was designed to analyse the manuscripts submitted to Nature-branded journals publishing primary research between March 2015 (when the Nature-branded primary research journals introduced DBPR as an opt-in service) and February 2017. decision sent to author nature communications posted by Manuscript then goes into said editor's pile, and waits until it gets to the front of the line. The height of the rectangles is related to the significance and the width to the amount of data that support the result. We used a significance threshold of 0.05. Similar to the uptake case, the models do not have a good fit to the data. ~. Tulare Ca Obituaries, In the past if your work wasn't accepted in Nature or Science researchers would often try the respected general journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA, or PNAS - which wags dubbed "Probably Not . This means that there is a statistically significant difference between the three groups. Nature-branded journals publishing primary research introduced DBPR as an optional service in March 2015 in response to authors requests [17]. Nature Support Solution home Author and Peer Reviewer Support Submission Rejection of your paper / manuscript Modified on: Mon, 26 Jul, 2021 at 6:04 PM Springer is committed to your. The Editor may be reading and assessing the submission, assigning additional editors according to the journal's polices, or taking some other action outside of the system. Accelerated Communications, JBC Reviews, Meeting Reports, Letters to the Editor, and Corrections, as well as article types that publish . This result does not change significantly if we focus on the three institution groups we defined (high-, medium-, and low-prestige), thus excluding the fourth group for which no THE rank was found (Pearsons chi-square test results: 2=49.405, df=2, p value <0.001, Cramers V=0.064), which means that authors from less prestigious institutions tend to be rejected more than authors from more prestigious institutions, regardless of review type. Several Nature journals (see list below) follow a transparent peer review system, publishing details about the peer review process as part of the publication (including the reviewer comments to. When the Editors begin to enter a decision it will move the status to 'Decision in Process'. Renee Wever. Most journals have online submission systems, which have definitely made it easier and quicker for authors to submit their manuscripts. 2007;18(2):MR000016. Proofs are sent before publication; authors are welcome to discuss proposed changes with Nature's subeditors, but Nature reserves the right to make the final decision about matters of style and the size of figures. Nature Communications is an open access, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-quality research in all areas of the biological, physical, chemical and Earth sciences. 0000008659 00000 n At the point of first submission, authors have to indicate whether they wish to have their manuscript considered under SBPR or DBPR, and this choice is maintained if the manuscript is declined by one journal and transferred to another. The WeWork Decision. 0000002247 00000 n The Editor has made a decision and requested you revise the submission. 0000047805 00000 n In Review. The multivariate regression analyses we performed led to uninformative models that did not fit the data well when the response was author uptake, out-to-review decision, or acceptance decision, and the predictors were review type, author gender, author institution, author country, and journal tier. Depending upon the nature of the revisions, the revised paper may be sent out for additional review or it may be accepted directly. In our case, the option that the outcome is subject to a complex combination of soft constraints or incentives is possible, which supports our simpler approach of evaluating the variables with the bivariate approach we have reported on. We excluded the records for which the assigned gender was NA and focussed on a dataset of 17,167 records, of which 2849 (17%) had a female corresponding author and 14,318 (83%) had a male corresponding author. You will receive more information via email from the production team regarding the publication process. 2017;6:e21718. Each journal is able to customize the wording of the status terms, but the same status phases apply to all journals using Editorial Manager. 0000002625 00000 n Methods Data includes 128,454 manuscripts . These results suggest that the choice of DBPR may be linked with a higher perceived risk of discrimination, with the exception of gender discrimination. Internet Explorer). In the following analysis, we will refer to the data for groups 1, 2, and 3 as the Institution Dataset. Next steps for publishing your article: What to expect after acceptance, Timescale to publish an article for a Springer journal, Page numbers in a Continuous Article Publishing (CAP) Journal. Also, because of the retrospective nature of this study, we could not conduct controlled experiments. isolera golv plintgrund waiting to send decision to author nature. In order to see whether author uptake could be accurately predicted based on author and journal characteristics, we attempted to fit logistic regression models to the data. Posted on 31st May 2022 by 31st May 2022 by Make the correction notice free to view. On this page you will find a suite of citation-based metrics for Nature Communications which provides an overview of this journal. The post-review outcome of papers as a function of the institution group and review model (Table15) showed that manuscripts from less prestigious institutions are accepted at a lower rate than those from more prestigious ones, even under DBPR; however, due to the small numbers of papers at this stage, the results are not statistically significant. Every step is described and will let you know whether action is required. &@ 5A9BC|2 @So0 Thus, we cannot draw conclusions on any editor bias. Papers. Article-level metrics are also available on each article page, allowing readers to track the reach of individual papers. This might indicate that authors are more likely to choose DBPR when the stakes are higher in an attempt to increase their success chances by removing any implicit bias from the referees. (The FAQ has more details about the mechanics of how this works.). authors opting for DBPR should not post on preprint archives). Please watch the Submission status explainer video below for more information. This status will remain until you begin the process of submitting your revision. If you choose to opt in, your article will undergo some basic quality controlchecks before being sent to theIn Reviewplatform. We investigated the proportion of OTR papers (OTR rate) under both peer review models to see if there were any differences related to gender or institution. . Share your preprint and track your manuscript's review progress with our In Review service. As mentioned above and discussed below in more detail, the fact that we did not control for the quality of the manuscripts means that the conclusions on the efficacy of DBPR that can be drawn from this data are limited. In the context of scientific literature, an analysis of 2680 manuscripts from seven journals found no overall difference in the acceptance rates of papers according to gender, while at the same time reporting a strong effect of number of authors and country of affiliation on manuscripts acceptance rates [9]. The process was on par with other journal experiences, but I do not appreciate the inconsistency between what the editor at Nature Medicine told me when transferring to Nature Comms, and the final evaluation at Nature Comms. The area under the receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curve is 0.65. Median values and the graphed interval (minimum and maximum values), are indicated. 0000055535 00000 n Hope everybody's doing well. by | May 28, 2022 | vga white light on asus motherboard | anskan om utbyte av utlndskt krkort | May 28, 2022 | vga white light on asus motherboard | anskan om utbyte av utlndskt krkort After reviewing the reports, you can proceed to making decisions on papers. If you have previously submitted a paper to a Nature Portfolio journal and would like an update on the status of your submission, please login to the manuscript tracking account for the . https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.4.715. We are a world leading research, educational and professional publisher. Accepted articles are automatically sent to the production department once the Editor has made a final decision of 'Accept'. Sci World J. Am J Roentgenol. We observed a trend in which the OTR rate for both DBPR and SBPR papers decreases as the prestige of the institution groups decreases, and we tested for the significance of this. Springer Nature. Article Tracking will guide you through the stages from the moment your article has been submitted until it is published. PubMedGoogle Scholar. The page will refresh upon submission. We investigated the relationship between review type and institutional prestige (as measured by the institution groups) by testing the null hypothesis that the review type is independent from prestige.

Presbyterian Church Split Over Slavery, How To Earthbend In Real Life Step By Step, Articles D